Critics have rushed to the internet to slam the ‘tacky’ change

The recent unveiling of the redesigned White House Rose Garden by former President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump has stirred a wave of public disapproval. The once-familiar garden, cherished as a historic and lush oasis, has taken on a drastically different appearance, following its controversial redesign.

This garden, which was originally established in 1913 during President Woodrow Wilson’s administration, became an iconic green space when Jackie Kennedy revitalized it in the early 1960s. Known for its vibrant roses and verdant landscape, the garden was considered a national treasure.

However, recent transformations overseen by the Trumps have conjured mixed feelings. The traditional grass has been replaced with a prominent concrete slab, altering the garden’s character significantly.

President Trump explained that the decision to introduce concrete was driven by practical considerations. The soft, grassy terrain posed challenges during press conferences and formal garden events, particularly when it had rained.

In an interview, he stated, “We often use the Rose Garden for press conferences, which can be troublesome due to the uneven ground. Notably, high heels can sink into the grass, creating impractical conditions.”

The redesign work commenced last month, with White House officials asserting that the restoration maintains respect for the site’s history while improving its functionality for hosting events.

A spokesperson mentioned, “This restoration honors the beauty of the Rose Garden and enhances its use for special occasions, keeping in line with the previous work conducted in 2020.”

Despite these assurances, the transformation has sparked a slew of criticism across social media platforms. One Instagram user lambasted the redesign, calling it “Tacky and tasteless.”

Another remarked, “I hope the next administration restores Jackie’s roses.” Yet another critic expressed, “Deplorable; the Jackie Kennedy Rose Garden was beautiful.”

Some critics have been highly vocal, with comments like, “How fitting. They destroy everything living and beautiful,” and “Wow, trading flowers and natural beauty for concrete?” These reflect widespread sentiment mourning the loss of the original garden aesthetics.

There are also calls for future administrations to prevent such changes: “No president should ever be allowed to modify White House grounds permanently. It’s not your property to alter.”

Despite the discontent, it’s crucial to remember that the redesign is an ongoing process, slated for completion by mid-August.

For many, the outcome remains to be seen whether these changes will indeed bring the promised practical benefits or if they’ll continue to be perceived as a departure from the garden’s historical essence.